1980
DOI: 10.1002/sca.4950030403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On‐line computation of diffractograms for the analysis of SEM images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, this measured value is closely related to the electron beam size when we utilize the ideal sample for highresolution observation. However, the electron beam size is not numerically in agreement with the present measured value, since they each have different definitions (Erasmus et al 1980). The minimum specimen periodicity Λ min may be of the order of twice the electron beam diameter or the conventional edge-to-edge resolution (Reimer 1985).…”
Section: A Highly Precise Resolution Measurement Of Sem Images Using mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…On the other hand, this measured value is closely related to the electron beam size when we utilize the ideal sample for highresolution observation. However, the electron beam size is not numerically in agreement with the present measured value, since they each have different definitions (Erasmus et al 1980). The minimum specimen periodicity Λ min may be of the order of twice the electron beam diameter or the conventional edge-to-edge resolution (Reimer 1985).…”
Section: A Highly Precise Resolution Measurement Of Sem Images Using mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The FFT resolution method generates the power spectrum, that is, the two-dimensional Fourier transform, of the image (Dodson and Joy 1990, Erasmus et al 1980, Joy 2002 and determines from this the highest spatial frequency which it contains. This corresponds to the smallest detectable distance between fea- 178 Scanning Vol.…”
Section: Fourier Transform Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the discrimination between signal and noise is necessarily imprecise, although in a recent implementation (Rosenberg et al 2002), the effects of operator choice were completely removed by introducing an automated procedure to infer the threshold between signal and noise in the Fourier space. The superposition diffractogram method (Erasmus et al 1980, Joy 2002, Oho and Toyomura 2001, also avoids the necessity for operator input, but it requires two sequentially recorded copies of the same image.…”
Section: Fourier Transform Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis of the method is to obtain a diffractogram in the form of a power spectrum i.e. the two-dimensional Fourier transform, of the image 10 . The intensity distribution of the different spatial frequencies in the image is displayed with the frequency increasing radially from the center of the transform.…”
Section: Using the Analysis Programmentioning
confidence: 99%