2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2018.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line calibration and uncertainties evaluation of spherical joint positions on large aircraft component for zero-clearance posture alignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the wing-fuselage docking system shown in Figure 1, the fuselage has been fixed at the predetermined position, and the wing is connected with three NCPs through a ball joints composed of ball head and ball socket [33]. The three-dimensional force sensor (TDFS) is installed below the ball joint to measure the contact force of the ball joint and serves as the connecting part between the ball joint and the NCP body [34].…”
Section: Posture Adjustment Principle Of Lacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the wing-fuselage docking system shown in Figure 1, the fuselage has been fixed at the predetermined position, and the wing is connected with three NCPs through a ball joints composed of ball head and ball socket [33]. The three-dimensional force sensor (TDFS) is installed below the ball joint to measure the contact force of the ball joint and serves as the connecting part between the ball joint and the NCP body [34].…”
Section: Posture Adjustment Principle Of Lacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al (2016) analyzed the application of an asymmetric actuated three-PPPS parallel mechanism in aircraft wing adjustment, and used the kinematic calibration method to improve the posture alignment precision of the wing end. To improve the calibration accuracy of the ball joint center (BJC) position of the attitude adjustment mechanism, Deng et al (2019) proposed a new relative posture evaluation model considering the anisotropic measurement uncertainties of key points, and analyzed the correction uncertainties by Monte Carlo simulation. However, these two methods are only applicable for the PAM with some axes are follow-up axes (Zhu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 After the LCA is transported to the assembly shop through automated guided vehicle (AGV), the process of driving the NCL to make the ball head of LCA fall into the ball socket of NCL accurately is called the ball head positioning. After the ball head is positioned, the LCA is connected with the NCL by a ball joint (BJ) which is composed of a ball head and a ball socket, 10 and the ball head can rotate freely relative to the ball socket, as shown in Figure 1. The ball joint center (BJC) is the common point between the LCA and the NCL; let q i f = [ x i f y i f z i f ] T denote the coordinate of the BJCi in local coordinate system (LCS) of LCA and q i g = [ x i g y i g z i g ] T denote the coordinate of the BJCi in global coordinate system (GCS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%