2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10506-018-9223-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On legal contracts, imperative and declarative smart contracts, and blockchain systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the legal perspective, [23] analyzed the legal validity, interpretation, and lifecycle of contracts in either imperative or declarative smart contracts. Imperative language is most commonly used in smart contracts, which "the programmer writes an explicit sequence of steps to be executed to produce the intended result.…”
Section: R Lucianomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the legal perspective, [23] analyzed the legal validity, interpretation, and lifecycle of contracts in either imperative or declarative smart contracts. Imperative language is most commonly used in smart contracts, which "the programmer writes an explicit sequence of steps to be executed to produce the intended result.…”
Section: R Lucianomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imperative language is most commonly used in smart contracts, which "the programmer writes an explicit sequence of steps to be executed to produce the intended result. The programmer has to write what has to be done and how to perform it" [23]. On the other hand, the authors present the alternative declarative language, arguing that it is a more feasible representation of natural language which "the programmer does not have to write explicitly the sequence of steps to specify what has to be done.…”
Section: R Lucianomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 The underlying rule is declared to be of cardinal importance for the whole framework of the civil law system. 33 Accordingly, a contract entails not only the effects expressed therein but also those that follow from a normative act, principles of social coexistence and established customs. 34 Thus, in terms of determining the content of obligation, encompassing the rights and duties of the parties, the content of contract ascertained adequately within the process of its interpretation 35 constitutes but one among a number of factors to be considered.…”
Section: Conceptualisation Of Contract Under Polish Law: An Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The escape hatch can be sued to allow for the modification of the contract terms, to cater for the real-life contracts which are characterised by vast dynamics. Nevertheless, implementing such in the smart contracts may compromise the security apparatus, and hence may require further tightening of the transaction controls in order to ensure that the escape hatch is not used to initiate invalid transaction or transactions that are aimed at unauthorised manipulation of records This is as well noted by Governatori et al (2018), who explained that, owing to the complexity of the smart contract and blockchain technology in general , ensuring that the right permission is granted to the right node, and that all the nodes are able to monitor the amendment of the contract may be quite tricky but necessary.…”
Section: Immutabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%