1977
DOI: 10.1137/1122003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Large Deviations from the Invariant Measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
225
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
225
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the Girtner (71-Ellis (61 theorem, under conditions (2) and (4)- (7). the large deviations principle (LDP) bolds for Z with large deviations rate function I; i.e., for each Borel set A …”
Section: Let I Be the Associated Large Deviations (Lld) Rate Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the Girtner (71-Ellis (61 theorem, under conditions (2) and (4)- (7). the large deviations principle (LDP) bolds for Z with large deviations rate function I; i.e., for each Borel set A …”
Section: Let I Be the Associated Large Deviations (Lld) Rate Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. In the theory and applications of large deviations, I plays an important role as the rate function for the normalised occupation measure of one Brownian motion (or, one Brownian bridge) in , in the limit as time to infinity [13][14][15][16]20]. It is remarkable that, in Theorem 1.5, in conjunction with Proposition 1.3(ii), this function turns out also to govern the large deviations for the mean of the normalised occupation measures under the symmetrised measure µ (sym) ,N , in the limit of large number of motions.…”
Section: An Important Special Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since EIj is finite it is clear that p(IIx), being an isolated root of the characteristic equation for the matrix II, is differentiable with respect to A (see [14] for details). Therefore, Theorem 2.3.1 may be applied to complete the proof.…”
Section: Then I() Is a Good Convex Rate Function Which Controls Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The credit for the extension of Cramer's theorem to the dependent case should definitely go to Ga.rtner [14] who considered the case in which DA = IR d . Ellis [10] extended this result to the steep set up and the formulation of section 2.3 is nothing but an embellishment of his results.…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%