1966
DOI: 10.1007/bf00537136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On large deviations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The subsequent Theorem 2 is derived from (1.4) combined with a well-known lemma on large deviations for a single random variable due to Statulevičius [15], see also [13], Lemma 2.3. In this way we obtain large deviations relations (in the sense of H. Cramér) for the total length of the BM contained in [0, T ] as well as an optimal uniform bound of the distance between the distribution function F T (x) = P(| ∩ [0, T ]| − E| ∩ [0, T ]| ≤ xσ T ) and the standard normal distribution function (x) = …”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subsequent Theorem 2 is derived from (1.4) combined with a well-known lemma on large deviations for a single random variable due to Statulevičius [15], see also [13], Lemma 2.3. In this way we obtain large deviations relations (in the sense of H. Cramér) for the total length of the BM contained in [0, T ] as well as an optimal uniform bound of the distance between the distribution function F T (x) = P(| ∩ [0, T ]| − E| ∩ [0, T ]| ≤ xσ T ) and the standard normal distribution function (x) = …”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the fundamentally new steps in the theory of large deviations was taken by Statulevi6ius [24], who proposed to assume conditions on the behavior of cumulants. For one variable ~ (E/I = 0, D~ = 1), the Statulevi~ius condition (S) can be written in the following way:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, (3) is a lattice analogue of the Statulevieius (S) condition for cumulants [36]. Condition (S) and its generalizations (see [34]) appeared to be very useful for the normal approximation, because it reduced the problem of large deviations to the problem of estimating such "nice" quantities as cumulants (a comprehensive review of the results under condition (S) can be found in the book by Saulis and Statulevieius [35]).…”
Section: Integral and Local Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 98%