2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-012-0852-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On L-spaces and left-orderable fundamental groups

Abstract: Examples suggest that there is a correspondence between L-spaces and 3manifolds whose fundamental groups cannot be left-ordered. In this paper we establish the equivalence of these conditions for several large classes of such manifolds. In particular, we prove that they are equivalent for any closed, connected, orientable, geometric 3-manifold that is non-hyperbolic, a family which includes all closed, connected, orientable Seifert fibred spaces. We also show that they are equivalent for the 2-fold branched co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
223
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
223
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result follows from [BGW,Proposition 7]. Compare with the proof of Theorem 7 of that paper and the comments which follow it.…”
Section: Proposition 72 ([Bgw])mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result follows from [BGW,Proposition 7]. Compare with the proof of Theorem 7 of that paper and the comments which follow it.…”
Section: Proposition 72 ([Bgw])mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Further, it follows from [BRW,Theorems 1.3 and 1.7] that when W is a non-hyperbolic geometric manifold, W has a left-orderable fundamental group if and only if it admits a co-oriented taut foliation. On the other hand, [BGW,Theorem 1 and Corollary 1] imply that for such manifolds, the latter is equivalent to the condition that W not be an L-space. Thus understanding the relationship between the three conditions reduces to the case when W is a rational homology 3-sphere which is either hyperbolic or has a non-trivial JSJ decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then ρ sn (a) has order n. It follows from [H,Theorem 3.1] (see also [BGW,Theorem 6]) that π 1 (Σ n (K)) is leftorderable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…By contrast, there are 2-bridge knots K such that Σ n (K) has non-left-orderable fundamental group for all n, by [Te,Proof of Theorem 2] and [BGW,Theorem 4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(see [1,5,6,16,21]). Recall that an L-space is a rational homology sphere with Heegaard Floer homology that is as simple as possible, in the sense that rk HF(Y ) = |H 1 (Y ; Z)| (see [15]).…”
Section: Definition 1 a Group G Is Left-orderable If There Exists A mentioning
confidence: 99%