On $L^2$ extension from singular hypersurfaces

Kim, Dano; Seo, Hoseob

doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.03554

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…, m, E ′ j := E j \ (∪ i =j E i ). By [KS20,Prop. 3.4 (2)], the restriction of dν on E ′ j has poles along the divisor (7) (…”

Section: Proofs Of the Main Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

$L^2$ extension of holomorphic functions for log canonical pairs

Kim¹

2021

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a general L 2 extension theorem of Demailly for log canonical pairs, the L 2 condition with respect to the Ohsawa measure determines when a function can be extended. We give a geometric characterization of this analytic condition in terms of log canonical centers. Moreover, the singularity of the Ohsawa measure is shown to be determined according to subadjunction on each maximal log canonical center with a unique log canonical place. This implies that the L 2 condition is essentially equivalent to one that appeared in a previous L 2 extension theorem of the author, which enables to combine these results into common generalization/strengthening. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Log canonical centers 8 3. Proofs of the main results 13 4. L 2 extension theorem for a log canonical center 20 5. Kawamata metric and Ohsawa measure 22 References 26Key words and phrases. L 2 extension theorems; Ohsawa-Takegoshi extension; Log canonical center; Ohsawa measure; Subadjunction.1 More precisely, Ψ is allowed to be 'log canonical along Y ' in [O5, Thm.4] as well as in [D15, Thm. 2.8]. See Remark 1.3. 2 However the formulation of [K07, Thm. 4.2] did not use Ψ functions. Also it dealt with divisorial pairs only but the arguments apply to more general pairs as in this paper. In this paper, we will assume X smooth in [K07, Thm. 4.2]. 3 This condition should be made explicit in [K07, Thm. 4.2].

show abstract

“…, m, E ′ j := E j \ (∪ i =j E i ). By [KS20,Prop. 3.4 (2)], the restriction of dν on E ′ j has poles along the divisor (7) (…”

Section: Proofs Of the Main Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…From [D15,Prop. 4.5 (a)] (also see [KS20,Prop. 3.4 (2)]), such dν exists as a measure on the regular locus of T .…”

Section: Proofs Of the Main Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

$L^2$ extension of holomorphic functions for log canonical pairs

Kim¹

2021

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In a recent paper [15], the authors present the following natural question posed by Kollár whether we can find an analytic proof of Theorem 1.3 relying on an L 2 extension theorem. Concretely, we have Question 1.1.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Concretely, we have Question 1.1. ( [15], Question B). Does the inversion of adjunction Theorem 1.3 have an analytic proof using L 2 extension theorems?…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%