2008
DOI: 10.2140/agt.2008.8.1141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On knot Floer width and Turaev genus

Abstract: To each knot $K\subset S^3$ one can associated its knot Floer homology $\hat{HFK}(K)$, a finitely generated bigraded abelian group. In general, the nonzero ranks of these homology groups lie on a finite number of slope one lines with respect to the bigrading. The width of the homology is, in essence, the largest horizontal distance between two such lines. Also, for each diagram $D$ of $K$ there is an associated Turaev surface, and the Turaev genus is the minimum genus of all Turaev surfaces for $K$. We show th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the Turaev genus plus two bounds the homological thickness for both Khovanov homology and knot Floer homology [16,5,13]. The Turaev genus is preserved after inserting a rational tangle as in Theorem 2.1.…”
Section: Proposition 12 (Proposition 33 In [18]) If L Is a Quasi-amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the Turaev genus plus two bounds the homological thickness for both Khovanov homology and knot Floer homology [16,5,13]. The Turaev genus is preserved after inserting a rational tangle as in Theorem 2.1.…”
Section: Proposition 12 (Proposition 33 In [18]) If L Is a Quasi-amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [Low08], the second author interpreted the δ-grading in terms of information about the Tait graph of the knot diagram. The δ-grading corresponding to a spanning tree T is …”
Section: Knot Homology Concordance Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Champanerkar, Kofman, and Stoltzfus [CKS07] use Theorem 4.1 to show that for any knot diagram, the difference between the maximum and minimum δ-gradings in the spanning tree complex for reduced Khovanov homology is equal to the genus of the Turaev surface of that diagram. Using a different approach, the second author [Low08] proved that for any knot diagram, the difference between the maximum and minimum δ-gradings in the spanning tree complex for knot Floer homology is equal to the genus of the Turaev surface of that diagram. In light of Proposition 3.3, the second author's result can be shown using the same approach as Champanerkar, Kofman, and Stoltzfus [CKS07], and both results can be encoded by the equation…”
Section: The Turaev Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not know whether a mutant of an adequate link is adequate. We recall the Turaev surface associated to a connected link diagram (see [8,9] or [16]). First, we construct a cobordism Fig.…”
Section: Lemma 22 a Mutant Of An Adequate Diagram Is Adequatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that Lowrance found an analogue for the homological width of the Floer homology of a knot [16].…”
Section: Lemma 22 a Mutant Of An Adequate Diagram Is Adequatementioning
confidence: 99%