1988
DOI: 10.2307/2047154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Joint Hyponormality of Operators

Abstract: ABSTRACT. A notion of joint hyponormality is introduced for a collection of bounded linear operators on a separable Hubert space.It is the purpose of this note to introduce a notion of joint hyponormality for a collection of bounded linear operators on a separable Hubert space ßtf in a way that will meet the following conditions.(a) The notion of joint hyponormality will be in some sense a natural generalization of the notion of hyponormality for a single operator.(b) The notion will be at least as strong as r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following Corollary is a generalization of Proposition 3 in [3]. The proof is an easy consequence of the previous Theorem 2.…”
Section: Formally Subnormal Multi-operatorsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following Corollary is a generalization of Proposition 3 in [3]. The proof is an easy consequence of the previous Theorem 2.…”
Section: Formally Subnormal Multi-operatorsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…According to the definition of a hyponormal multi-operator given by A. Athavale in the bounded case (see [3]) and not using the notion of commutativity, which is delicate for unbounded operators, we give a notion of joint hyponormality for unbounded operators :…”
Section: Formally Subnormal Multi-operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1], [8]). The n-tuple T is said to be normal if T is commuting and each T i is normal, and T is subnormal if T is the restriction of a normal n-tuple to a common invariant subspace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known ( [15 i, j=1 is positive, or equivalently, the (k + 1) × (k + 1) operator matrix in (0.4) is positive (via the operator version of Choleski's Algorithm), then the Bram-Halmos criterion can be rephrased as saying that T is subnormal if and only if T is k-hyponormal for every k м 1 ( [18]). Recall ( [1], [18], [5]) that T ∈ L (H ) is said to be weakly k-hyponormal if L S((T, T 2 , . .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%