2020
DOI: 10.33044/revuma.v61n2a05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Jacobson's lemma and Cline's formula for Drazin inverses

Abstract: Under new conditions bac = bdb and cdb = cac, we present extensions of Jacobson's lemma and Cline's formula for the generalized Drazin inverse and pseudo Drazin inverse in a ring. Applying these results, we give Jacobson's lemma for the Drazin inverse, group inverse, and ordinary inverse, and Cline's formula for the Drazin inverse.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The set composed of generalized Drazin invertible elements in R will be denoted by R gD . In [18], the authors obtained the following analogue of Jacobson's lemma for generalized Drazin inverse under the assumption (1.3), which gives an affirmative answer to a conjecture of [15].…”
Section: Generalized Inverses Related To Generalized Drazin Inversementioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The set composed of generalized Drazin invertible elements in R will be denoted by R gD . In [18], the authors obtained the following analogue of Jacobson's lemma for generalized Drazin inverse under the assumption (1.3), which gives an affirmative answer to a conjecture of [15].…”
Section: Generalized Inverses Related To Generalized Drazin Inversementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Corach et al in [7] generalized (1.1) and many of its relatives to the case that (1.2) aba = aca, see also [20,21,22,23]. Recently, it has been realized that there are proper counterparts of Jacobson's lemma for Drazin inverse and generalized Drazin inverse under the new condition (1.3) acd = dbd, dba = aca, see [15,18]. Obviously, the case "a = d" in (1.3) gives (1.2), the case "b = c" in (1.2) results in aca = aca.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to [24], a ∈ R is p-Drazin invertible exactly when a is a pseudo-polar element (i.e., there exists p 2 = p ∈ comm 2 (a) such that a+p ∈ U(R) and ap ∈ J(R)). For more interesting properties of p-Drazin inverses, one may refer to [11,19,25,26] and the reference therewith.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%