2019
DOI: 10.1109/lwc.2018.2874935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Iterative Compensation of Clipping Distortion in OFDM Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to [19], the number of iterations for the converged BER dominates the complexity of receiver-based solutions due to the usage of FFT/IFFT pairs. There are usually one or two iterations in most schemes, except for in the case of ISR (e.g., [12][13][14][15][16]). In this example, the proposed scheme further enhances the converged BER to 10 −5 within five iterations, which consumes two to five times more complexity when compared with the consumption of other schemes.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to [19], the number of iterations for the converged BER dominates the complexity of receiver-based solutions due to the usage of FFT/IFFT pairs. There are usually one or two iterations in most schemes, except for in the case of ISR (e.g., [12][13][14][15][16]). In this example, the proposed scheme further enhances the converged BER to 10 −5 within five iterations, which consumes two to five times more complexity when compared with the consumption of other schemes.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The receiver-side remedies for PA nonlinearity in OFDM systems have been widely investigated in the literature [12][13][14][15][16]; however, the increase in processing time makes such iterative methods infeasible due to the high data rate requirement of mobile broadband. Nevertheless, these techniques may come in handy for LPWA uplinks to support machine-type communications, which need to leave all possible complicated operations at base stations for power saving [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The receiver-side signal linearization approaches are particularly suitable for MTC type systems where the IoT-CD traffics are UL-dominated [18]. With the abovementioned advantages, the studies on receiver-side compensation have been extensively reported in literature in the following two categories: (1) maximum-likelihood (ML) detection-based (e.g., [24]- [26]), and (2) signal compensation (SC)-based (e.g., [27]- [30]). The former can achieve a better bit error rate (BER) performance than the latter at the expense of exponentially growing computational complexity with the FFT size that leads to infeasibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the paper, we focus on the fundamental perfor-mance of the uncoded OFDM system over both additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) and frequency-selective Rayleigh fading channels. Our analytical results on SNDR may be also valid for coded OFDM systems (e.g., [18]- [21]), but their precise analysis is beyond the scope of this work. We note that most of the conventional TD compensation schemes such as the original work of DAR [11] as well as [14], [16], [18], [19], [21] have been focused on the clipped OFDM signal (without filtering), but as mentioned above, clipping should be applied to oversampled OFDM signals together with filtering for lower PAPR and higher SDR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analytical results on SNDR may be also valid for coded OFDM systems (e.g., [18]- [21]), but their precise analysis is beyond the scope of this work. We note that most of the conventional TD compensation schemes such as the original work of DAR [11] as well as [14], [16], [18], [19], [21] have been focused on the clipped OFDM signal (without filtering), but as mentioned above, clipping should be applied to oversampled OFDM signals together with filtering for lower PAPR and higher SDR. It will be shown that in the presence of CAF, the TD reconstruction process fails to take into account the effect of filtering on the resulting signals and thus should lead to some degradation in terms of its achievable performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%