1991
DOI: 10.1080/07900629108722523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On irrigation water pricing in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, water charges in India remain so low that they often do not even cover the operation and maintenance costs of the canal system [Jones 1995]. 6 In fact, Prasad and Rao [1991] show that tax collection costs often exceed the amount collected. The inability or unwillingness to 6.…”
Section: Iib Benefits and Costs Of Irrigation Damsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, water charges in India remain so low that they often do not even cover the operation and maintenance costs of the canal system [Jones 1995]. 6 In fact, Prasad and Rao [1991] show that tax collection costs often exceed the amount collected. The inability or unwillingness to 6.…”
Section: Iib Benefits and Costs Of Irrigation Damsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many concepts of water pricing were developed in the past, such as cost pricing, benefi t pricing, and opportunity costs (Doppler 1977 ;Prasad and Rao 1991 ;Sampath 1992 ). However, pricing is often determined by the amount needed to recover at least the cost of maintenance and operation of an irrigation project.…”
Section: Introduction (Including Success and Failure Of Past Pricing mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bihar, collection costs are said to sometimes exceed the income derived, being estimated at between 52% and 117% of the amount collected (Prasad and Rao, 1991). For Bhatia (1991), collection keeps '5,000 persons busy and unproductive in the fields'.…”
Section: Rates Of Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vietnam); in Iran, regulated surface water charges are limited to 1-3% of the gross value of crop output (Keshavarz et al, 2005); in Cyprus, the charge is limited to no more than 40% of the weighted average unit cost (65% in exceptional cases) (Tsiourtis, 2002); in India, a 1972 policy review recommended that water rates should lie within the range of 5-12% of gross farm revenue (Prasad and Rao, 1991;Vaidyanathan, 1992). Elsewhere, minimum values are sometimes (ineffectively) decreed as in Korea (Sarker and Itoh, 2001) and Peru (Vos, 2002).…”
Section: The Burden Of Irrigation Chargesmentioning
confidence: 99%