1994
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(94)95464-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On ionic charge distributions of heavy evaporation residues passing through a carbon foil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1(a). As we see in the figure, all the predictions [3,4,[7][8][9] are narrower than the experimental ones [10] along with some shifts of the mean charge values. Evidently, a Gaussian cannot describe the asymmetric distributions which are observed with very slow (when Q m → 0) or very fast (when Q m → Z HI ) HIs, as stressed in a number of works (see, for example, [4,5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1(a). As we see in the figure, all the predictions [3,4,[7][8][9] are narrower than the experimental ones [10] along with some shifts of the mean charge values. Evidently, a Gaussian cannot describe the asymmetric distributions which are observed with very slow (when Q m → 0) or very fast (when Q m → Z HI ) HIs, as stressed in a number of works (see, for example, [4,5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…So the predictive power of the empirical formulas [3,4,[7][8][9] for the equilibrated charges is not quite good for ERs downstream the carbon foil which should equilibrate (normalize) the distributions for ERs emerging from the targets. At the same time, the charge distributions for ERs emerging directly from the targets differ dramatically from the equilibrated ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations