On investment and construction activity tasks in the context of Russian spatial development trends

Abstract

Introduction. Russian spatial development strategy elaborated for the period up to 2025 set new targets for investment and construction sphere of the state. Importance of systematic approach to investment and construction activity (ICA) tasks is determined by the necessity of shifting the centers of regional economic development according to state global prospective advantage demands. Methods of analyzing condition and potential of activity in different regions and economic sectors as well as at diverse stages of project and reproduction cycles do not allow solving the integrated development problem of all investment and construction activity types depriving it of realization possibility of intraindustrial synergetic effects. It presumes elaboration of new methods of structural analysis, scientific and practical importance of which is connected with justification of investment and construction harmonization directions for the purpose of strategically necessary spatial maneuver. Materials and methods. Works of leading scientific schools in the field of construction development, methodological approaches to the justification of analytical instruments and alternative scientific ideas on increasing economic capacity of construction are analyzed. Basing on structuring method of problematic space of construction development, the authors elaborate a new format of structural intraindustrial analysis providing systematic integrity of construction as the basis of practical implementation of modern Russian development trends. Results. Fulfilled analysis revealed restraints in posing tasks of ICA integral development connected with the absence of scientifically justified approaches to structural analysis along with the necessity of comparative analysis criteria elaboration within both national economy sectors and types of activity as well as stages of project and reproductive cycles. Conclusions. Importance of proposals on widening the tasks and modifying the format of ICA structural analysis is determined by the necessity of moving towards integral effect of harmonious industry-specific development with the use of sectoral and typical advantages of construction as well as scientific justification of integral aims and tasks of sectoral management system development.

The influence of architectural decisions on improving the economic efficiency of development projects

“…At the same time, in practice, morally obsolete neighborhoods that meet Soviet standards, as well as post-Soviet trends in urban planning, are continue to be designed in the cities: fragmentary adjustments are made to the development of general plans, and urban development with multi-story residential districts without adequate infrastructure and without taking into account the socioeconomic behavior of the townspeople is noticed. Nevertheless, new trends are being consolidated: the reorientation of mass construction to integrated approaches to the design and development of residential areas, the formation of an effective strategy for spatial and territorial development of the urban environment and urban real estate [2,3,4]. When forming such a strategy from the point of view of architecture, the following decisions can be distinguished, which in the long term affect the capitalization of housing:…”

Efficiency assessment of urban planning transformations: economic and legal aspects

“…11]. Вместе с тем анализ работ ведущих ученых, например [1,2,11,14,[21][22][23], подтверждает влияние градостроительных факторов на формирование качества городской среды, следовательно, установление механизма, позволяющего оценить целесообразность градостроительного преобразования территорий города и показателей оценки эффективности принимаемого решения, объективно необходимо.…”

“…Зарубежные методики исследования городского пространства и креативного потенциала российских городов 1, 2 позволяют провести оценку перспектив модернизации экономики города на основе системного подхода к анализу урбанизированной территории крупных российских городов, создать систему мониторинга социокультурного разнообразия городского пространства с использованием экспертных методов, анкетирования и методов ранжирования. В число показателей одного из базовых блоков оценки креативного потенциала города входят показатели экономического положения города, развитости социальной инфраструктуры, комфортности городской среды 2 .…”

“…• изучены результаты зарубежных исследований городских пространств глобальных городов и оценки креативного капитала российских городов 1,2 ;…”

“…11]: «Реальность реализации намеченных мероприятий и проектов обеспечивается указанием источников финансирования и подтверждается бюджетами разного уровня». Однако сегодня, как, впрочем, и ранее, взаимосвязь социально-экономического и территориального планирования не подкреплена финансовыми ресурсами, а реализация принятых планов создания безопасных и благоприятных условий жизнедеятельности, также как и в период плановой экономики [2][3][4], тормозится из-за отсутствия бюджетных средств. Одной из наиболее острых проблем управления качеством городской среды, отмеченных в работах Л.Я.…”