2021
DOI: 10.1002/int.22405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On investigation of the Bayesian anomaly in multiple imprecise dependent information aggregation for system reliability evaluation

Abstract: The increasing complexity of the modern engineering system has made the multisource information fusion a necessary yet challenging task. In the context of reliability engineering, the information fusion process is either ineffective or less efficient as the aggregation error increases with respect to the collection of multiple dependent pieces of evidence. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a comprehensive Bayesian approach for system reliability evaluation that considers multiple, dependent source… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For stochastic model updating, methodologies such as the perturbation method [10,11], the random matrix method [12] and the interval estimation method [13] have been investigated in the literature. Another important method is Bayesian calibration (or Bayesian updating) [14,15]. Bayesian calibration integrates subjective prior information and experimental data to update parameters from a prior distribution towards a posterior distribution [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For stochastic model updating, methodologies such as the perturbation method [10,11], the random matrix method [12] and the interval estimation method [13] have been investigated in the literature. Another important method is Bayesian calibration (or Bayesian updating) [14,15]. Bayesian calibration integrates subjective prior information and experimental data to update parameters from a prior distribution towards a posterior distribution [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%