2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00285-011-0448-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On invasion boundaries and the unprotected coexistence of two strategies

Abstract: In this paper we present, in terms of invasion fitness functions, a sufficient condition for a coexistence of two strategies which are not protected from extinction when rare. In addition, we connect the result to the local characterization of singular strategies in the theory of adaptive dynamics. We conclude with some illustrative examples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two theorems byPriklopil (2012) connect the unfolding of M = 0 with the shortterm population dynamics of two coexisting resident strategies as follows (seePriklopil (2012) for details). (i) For > 0 sufficiently small, the invasion boundaries of the pairwise invasibility plot generically intersect in the neighbourhood of the singularity either when M = or when M = − .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two theorems byPriklopil (2012) connect the unfolding of M = 0 with the shortterm population dynamics of two coexisting resident strategies as follows (seePriklopil (2012) for details). (i) For > 0 sufficiently small, the invasion boundaries of the pairwise invasibility plot generically intersect in the neighbourhood of the singularity either when M = or when M = − .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resident-mutant coex-6 istence region is locally a cusp rooted at the singular point (x,x) (see [Priklopil, 2012, Dercole & Geritz, 2015), and though there might generically be up to two coexistence equilibria, only one is stable and 8 should be considered for developing a proper expansion of the dimorphic fitness. Further research could investigate the codimension-two bifurcation at which both fitness second-derivatives vanish (the type of 10 coexistence is already available in [Dercole & Geritz, 2015]), or the cases at whichλ (0,3) 1 = 0 together with one of the fitness second-derivatives; or, as well, higher codimensions that do occur in applications…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we unfold a model with M = 0 into a model with nonzero M, we encounter a situation where the invasion boundaries generically intersect each other (cf. Figure 4); and in the neighbourhood of such an intersection point, coexistence occurs also outside the area of mutual invasibility (Priklopil 2012). Hence the construction method yields not only examples for evolutionary branching, but also examples of unprotected coexistence with multiple attractors in the population dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…where in the last step we substituted dN (α * ) ds from equation (46), using (41) with s 0 = g 0 (P * ) P * 1 − P * S * Ŝ (α * ) P (α * ) (cf. (35). In (49), the derivativesN (α * ),Ŝ (α * ) andP (α * ) are from equations (28), (29) and (31), respectively.…”
Section: Transversality Condition For Unfolding M =mentioning
confidence: 99%