1996
DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(96)00002-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On invariant polyhedra of continuous-time systems subject to additive disturbances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the light of Theorems 2, 3 and 4, we get a method of verifying the criterion (8). For each k 0 ∈ {1, 2, · · · , t}, set (16), then determine its consistency, i.e., determining the consistency of following system of linear inequalities:…”
Section: Theorem 3 Let a And B Be As Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the light of Theorems 2, 3 and 4, we get a method of verifying the criterion (8). For each k 0 ∈ {1, 2, · · · , t}, set (16), then determine its consistency, i.e., determining the consistency of following system of linear inequalities:…”
Section: Theorem 3 Let a And B Be As Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other one is to design a viable solution within a viable set. Viability conditions for a linear control system has been studied extensively in recent years, see [6][7][8]. Although a necessary and sufficient viability condition for a differential inclusion was given in [9][10][11], it is a hard work to check that condition in most applications directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by Milani and Dórea (1996), the existence of admissible matrices W 2 and W 3 satisfying relations (24)-(25) is related to the following null-space intersections:…”
Section: General Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the positive invariance property in the control of constrained dynamical systems has been receiving much attention in the last years (Blanchini, 1990;Blanchini, 1994;De Santis, 1994;Georgiou and Krikelis, 1991;Gilbert and Tan, 1991;Hennet, 1989;Hennet and Béziat, 1991;Kolmanovski and Gilbert, 1995;Milani and Dórea, 1996;Tarbouriech and Gomes da Silva Jr., 1997;Tarbouriech and Castelan, 1993;Tarbouriech and Castelan, 1995). This property is used, for instance, to guarantee the maintenance of the state trajectories of a controlled system in the interior of some prescribed sets of admissible states determined from some sets of control or state constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another one is to design a viable solution within a viable set. Viability conditions for a linear control system have been studied widely in recent years; see [15,16]. A necessary and sufficient viability condition for a differential inclusion was given in [8,17], but it is a hard work to check that condition in most applications directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%