On interoperating incompatible atomic commit protocols in distributed databases

Al-Houmaily, Yousef J.

doi:10.1109/ccsp.2005.4977178

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Transaction is a basic unit to perform any operation on a database. Therefore, it is a unit of logical work composed of a set of data operations (read and write) [1]. It must follow Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability (ACID) property [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

SP-LIFT: A Serial Parallel Linear and Fast-Paced Recovery-Centered Transaction Commit Protocol

Pandey

Shanker

2020

SN COMPUT. SCI.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Linear two-phase commit (L-2PC) protocol is used in the commit processing of distributed transactions via the transaction managers of the various nodes when transaction runs serially. However, it suffers from the poor recovery process and some other associated problems also. In past, almost no effort has been done to overcome the aforementioned problems of L-2PC protocol. This paper is an attempt to propose a Serial Parallel Linear and Fast-paced recovery-centered Transaction (SP-LIFT) commit protocol by modifying the L-2PC. It gives autonomy to the participating cohorts by informing the cohort-in-doubt about the distributed transaction's state instead of always looking for the coordinator's stand. The SP-LIFT protocol is also different from LIFT protocol by allowing the second phase of commit processing to go in parallel while keeping the first phase of the commit processing the same as it was in the LIFT protocol. In this way, the SP-LIFT protocol allows the distributed transaction to complete its commit processing earlier as compared to the L-2PC and LIFT protocols. The performance results also confirm that the proposed protocol will be a better alternative.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

SP-LIFT: A Serial Parallel Linear and Fast-Paced Recovery-Centered Transaction Commit Protocol

Pandey

Shanker

2020

SN COMPUT. SCI.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The adaptive participant's presumption protocol (AP 3 ) [11] alleviates the above applicability limitation of 1PC protocols by integrating the implicit yes-vote (IYV) protocol [6], which is a one-phase commit protocol, with the best known two-phase commit variants, namely, presumed abort (PrA) [12] and presumed commit (PrC) [12]. Thus, achieving the performance advantages of 1PC protocols whenever possible, on one hand, and the broad applicability of 2PC protocols, on the other.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%