2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2023.111284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On inherent limitations in robustness and performance for a class of prescribed-time algorithms

Rodrigo Aldana-López,
Richard Seeber,
Hernan Haimovich
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the delay-free case, the mentioned time-dependent controller rejects matched additive disturbances of unknown magnitude, 13 but it is very sensitive with respect to measurement noise. 15,24 The main reason of such sensitivity is the time dependence of the feedback gain which, independently of the stabilization error and the magnitude of the measurement noise, infinitely amplifies the noise as time tends to the prescribed time T. To improve the robustness, a switching rule between time-dependent prescribed-time regulator and a static finite-time (sliding mode) stabilizer has been suggested in Reference 15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the delay-free case, the mentioned time-dependent controller rejects matched additive disturbances of unknown magnitude, 13 but it is very sensitive with respect to measurement noise. 15,24 The main reason of such sensitivity is the time dependence of the feedback gain which, independently of the stabilization error and the magnitude of the measurement noise, infinitely amplifies the noise as time tends to the prescribed time T. To improve the robustness, a switching rule between time-dependent prescribed-time regulator and a static finite-time (sliding mode) stabilizer has been suggested in Reference 15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%