1969
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1969.03160110135030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Ingestion of Razor Blades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was also true in the present case, as the can lid, after removal via enterotomy, was found to be extremely sharp and could have caused serious injury if used as a cutting tool. In other cases, prisoners have swallowed sharp objects, but first covered them with paper [5]. This would suggest that the primary intention is not solely to cause self-injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was also true in the present case, as the can lid, after removal via enterotomy, was found to be extremely sharp and could have caused serious injury if used as a cutting tool. In other cases, prisoners have swallowed sharp objects, but first covered them with paper [5]. This would suggest that the primary intention is not solely to cause self-injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those which cause most trouble are fish bones, which may cause perforation and mimic perforated peptic ulcer or appendicitis (Ashby and Hunter-Craig, 1967). Suprisingly, razor blades do not seem to cause much trouble (Johnson, 1969), possibly because of a local gut protective mechanism, the 'mural withdrawal reflex' (Maimon and Milligan, 1972).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Although the overall incidence of gastrointestinal perforation due to foreign body ingestion is less than 1%, sharp and pointed objects result in perforation rates of up to 35%, most commonly in the area of the ileocecal valve. 7,14,15 For this reason, a sharp or pointed object in the area of the stomach or proximal duodenum should be removed endoscopically if feasible. Administration of 0.5 mg of glucagon intravenously may help to slow motility and aid in retrieval.…”
Section: Sharp Foreign Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%