2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On inelastic hydrogen atom collisions in stellar atmospheres

Abstract: The influence of inelastic hydrogen atom collisions on non-LTE spectral line formation has been, and remains to be, a significant source of uncertainty for stellar abundance analyses, due to the difficulty in obtaining accurate data for low-energy atomic collisions either experimentally or theoretically. For lack of a better alternative, the classical "Drawin formula" is often used. Over recent decades, our understanding of these collisions has improved markedly, predominantly through a number of detailed quan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
94
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, such nonuniform scaling has recently been demonstrated for Mg + H by Barklem et al (2012). In principle, S H should depend on temperature (see Barklem et al 2011) and, because the different triplet lines form at different atmospheric heights, S H could be expected to vary slightly from line to line. Our analysis allows for this possibility, since we treat each of the triplet components separately.…”
Section: Assumption Of a Universal S Hmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In fact, such nonuniform scaling has recently been demonstrated for Mg + H by Barklem et al (2012). In principle, S H should depend on temperature (see Barklem et al 2011) and, because the different triplet lines form at different atmospheric heights, S H could be expected to vary slightly from line to line. Our analysis allows for this possibility, since we treat each of the triplet components separately.…”
Section: Assumption Of a Universal S Hmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…An enhancement factor SH to the Drawin formula was calibrated by studying the centre-to-limb variation in the Sun, following Pereira et al (2009) The dominant systematic errors in the non-LTE calculations likely arise from the errors in the rate of excitation via neutral hydrogen collisions. As discussed in Barklem et al (2011), the approach of calibrating the Drawin formula using a single parameter SH cannot correct any errors in the relative rates, and can mask other deficiencies in the models. One can get a feeling for the sensitivity of the results on the neutral hydrogen collisions by comparing the results with those obtained when SH is reduced to nought, thereby neglecting them altogether.…”
Section: Model Atommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only for a few atoms do we know the cross sections of inelastic collisions with neutral hydrogen from either experiments or quantum-mechanical computations. The use of the Drawin approximation (Drawin 1969;Steenbock & Holweger 1984) has been seriously criticised by Barklem et al (2011). For further discussion on this point see also Steffen et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%