On industrial knowledge bases, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages

Herstad, Sverre J.; Aslesen, Heidi Wiig; Ebersberger, Bernd

doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.003

Cited by 126 publications

(102 citation statements)

References 75 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The OECD Oslo Manualand hence Eurostat in the CIS-defines collaboration in innovation as joint innovation projects involving active participation-and knowledge or technology transfer-for all partners (OECD 2005). This is a somehow narrow definition of collaboration that focuses on development work excluding other innovative activities such as training, explorative activities where only information is transmitted and R&D outsourcing (Herstad, Aslesen, and Ebersberger 2014).…”

Section: Localized Collaboration In Innovation Within Global Innovatimentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaboration in Innovation Between Foreign Subsidiaries and Local Universities: Evidence from Spain

Ros

Salazar-Elena

2015

Industry and Innovation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaboration between foreign subsidiaries and universities is relevant for multinational companies (MNCs) that aim at absorbing knowledge from abroad, as well as for universities and policymakers attempting to maximize the spillovers associated with foreign direct investment (FDI). In this paper, we explore how MNCs collaborate with universities in the foreign countries where they locate and provide new empirical evidence for Spain as a host country. Using a probit model with panel data comprising 9,614 firms for the period 2005-2011, we explore differences between the propensity to collaborate with universities of foreign subsidiaries and Spanish firms. Subsequently, building on a new survey to 89 foreign subsidiaries and on a more detailed analysis of five case studies, we discuss the variety of motivations that drive collaboration with universities and relate the scale and scope of such collaborations with the dynamic mandates of foreign subsidiaries in global innovation networks.

show abstract

Section: Localized Collaboration In Innovation Within Global Innovatimentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaboration in Innovation Between Foreign Subsidiaries and Local Universities: Evidence from Spain

Ros

Salazar-Elena

2015

Industry and Innovation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several researchers have investigated different information sources that could impact the innovation activities of firms (e.g. Amara & Landry, 2005;Leiponen et al, 2011;Herstad et al, 2014). The rationale that links different sources of information and innovation performance is based on the fact that access to a larger variety of sources of information provides firms with more timely information about opportunities for development (Burt, 1992).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence Of Different Information Sources On Innovation Performance: Evidence From France, The Netherlands And Croatia

Bach

Лојпур

Peković

et al. 2015

South East European Journal of Economics and Business

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…That is why the aim of this article is to analyze what kind of network topology in one of the vertically integrated company to reveal the peculiarities and specifics of innovation collaboration process in space industry. Herstad, Alsenen, & Ebersberger (2014) claimed that in recent years, there has been a shift from a global production network paradigm (involving marketing move and optimal placement of production) to the global innovation network (GIN). In addition, according to Salavisa, Sousa, & Fontes, (2012) networking provides its participants with the probability of the business development, reduces the degree of uncertainty and risk, and accelerates the collection of information on resource capacity and quality (thus reducing transaction costs).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation networks: problems and prospects (Russian case study)

Chistyakova¹

2017

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The topologies of innovation network development in Russia are described in this article. Study was conductedin one of the Russian industrial leader JSC Academician M.F. Reshetnev "Information Satellite Systems". Theoretical approaches to the network nature and classification are revealed herein. Some characteristics of innovation network as relatedness, centrality, and intensity were discussed in the article."Information Satellite Systems" has a lot of branch and subsidiaries which form the innovation network of this enterprise. Research methodology consists of head of companies' survey and interview and analyses of open information of firm functioning. Results of research show the vertical hierarchaloriented innovation network with a low-degree of relatedness. Also anchor company ISS has a distinct network landscape with a focus on large vertically integrated, with a low degree of network connectivity, with the unexpressed (weak) links, where a key type of partnership is scientific collaboration with the base (dependent) subsidiary companies, universities and research institutes.

show abstract

On industrial knowledge bases, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages

Cited by 126 publications

References 75 publications

Collaboration in Innovation Between Foreign Subsidiaries and Local Universities: Evidence from Spain

Collaboration in Innovation Between Foreign Subsidiaries and Local Universities: Evidence from Spain

The Influence Of Different Information Sources On Innovation Performance: Evidence From France, The Netherlands And Croatia

Innovation networks: problems and prospects (Russian case study)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About