1993
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1993-1123649-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On induced representations of discrete groups

Abstract: Abstract.The paper deals with induced representations ind^ cr of a locally compact group G where H is an open subgroup. Using "elementary intertwining operators", we first describe the commutant ind# o(G)' (also in the case of realizing the induced representations with positive definite measures). Then criteria for irreducibility and pairwise disjointness of induced representations are given. Finally, special attention is devoted to abelian subgroups H .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That ϕ is well-defined and surjective follows, e. g., from [15,Proposition 2.39]. For the injectivity of ϕ see, e. g., [5,Theorem 3.2(ii)].…”
Section: We Use That S∈l(s) τ (S) = S∈l(s) τ (T S) For All T ∈ L(s) Pqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That ϕ is well-defined and surjective follows, e. g., from [15,Proposition 2.39]. For the injectivity of ϕ see, e. g., [5,Theorem 3.2(ii)].…”
Section: We Use That S∈l(s) τ (S) = S∈l(s) τ (T S) For All T ∈ L(s) Pqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To complete H to a C * -algebra we just close it in norm in the following regular representation of H in 2 (Γ 0 \Γ) (cf. [49]).…”
Section: Hecke Algebras Type III Factors and Statistical Theory Of Prime Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we assume dim(V σ ) = 1, although some of the results still will be true in greater generality, in particular the results about the set B, cf. [2,3].…”
Section: Hecke Pairs and Schlichting Completionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. Clearly ε x ∈ H σ (G, H) and is well-defined (these functions are essentially the elementary intertwining operators from [2]). Since ε h 0 xk 0 (hxk) = σ(h 0 )σ(k 0 )ε x (hxk) for all h 0 , k 0 ∈ H, different choices of representatives for the double coset HxH give rise to functions ε h 0 xk 0 which are scalar multiples of ε x , and since distinct double cosets do not support a common ε x the lemma follows.…”
Section: Hecke Pairs and Schlichting Completionsmentioning
confidence: 99%