On Incrementality in Dialogue: Evidence from Compound Contributions

Abstract

Spoken contributions in dialogue often continue or complete earlier contributions by either the same or a different speaker. These compound contributions (CCs) thus provide a natural context for investigations of incremental processing in dialogue.We present a corpus study which confirms that CCs are a key dialogue phenomenon: almost 20% of contributions fit our general definition of CCs, with nearly 3% being the cross-person case most often studied. The results suggest that processing is word-by-word incremental, as splits can occur within syntactic ‘constituents’; however, some systematic differences between same- and cross-person cases indicate important dialogue-specific pragmatic effects. An experimental study then investigates these effects by artificially introducing CCs into multi-party text dialogue. Results suggest that CCs affect people’s expectations about who will speak next and whether other participants have formed a coalition or ‘party’.Together, these studies suggest that CCs require an incremental processing mechanism that can provide a resource for constructing linguistic constituents that span multiple contributions and multiple participants. They also suggest the need to model higher-level dialogue units that have consequences for the organization of turn-taking and for the development of a shared context.

AsapRealizer 2.0: The Next Steps in Fluent Behavior Realization for ECAs

“…[2]). While speech can be seen as a concatenation of increments that are smaller than a sentence [1], the increments connect smoothly, and as a result prosodic properties that are suprasegmental (e.g. rhythm, sentence intonation) are observed in speech.…”

“…In this paper we have show how these two features play a part in the behavior realization within AsapRealizer. In [5] and on the Asap website 1 we illustrate in several scenarios how AsapRealizer's realization capabilities play out in concert with fluent intent and behavior planning and input processing.…”

“…In such interactions, utterances are produced incrementally [1,2], subject to on-the-fly adaptation (e.g. speaking louder to keep a challenged turn) and (self) interruptions.…”

An architecture for fluid real-time conversational agents: integrating incremental output generation and input processing

“…These fast adaptations rest on speakers producing their speech incrementally [19]. Often, utterances are started with appositional beginnings ("uh", "well", .…”

Collective Contexts in Conversation: Grounding by Proxy

“…Perhaps the most direct way in which people can combine conversationally is through the production of “split utterances” or “co‐constructions” in which one person finishes what another had started to say. These “split” utterances can project to other participants the sense that the people producing it are acting as a combined unit (Howes et al., ; Lerner, ; Sacks, ). People can also use their position and physical orientation in space to form and manage recognizable sub‐groups during conversation (Kendon, ).…”