1995
DOI: 10.1007/s004660050078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On implementation of a nonlinear four node shell finite element for thin multilayered elastic shells

Abstract: DRUGG-Digitalni repozitorij UL FGG http://drugg.fgg.uni-lj.si/ Ta članek je avtorjeva zadnja recenzirana različica, kot je bila sprejeta po opravljeni recenziji. Prosimo, da se pri navajanju sklicujte na bibliografske podatke, kot je navedeno:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results, obtained with the enhanced transverse shear strain method, are compared with the results of Brank et al [11] (Fig. 13).…”
Section: Pinching Of a Clamped Cylindermentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The present results, obtained with the enhanced transverse shear strain method, are compared with the results of Brank et al [11] (Fig. 13).…”
Section: Pinching Of a Clamped Cylindermentioning
confidence: 55%
“…15 is subjected to a pair of concentrated forces, inducing large displacements and rotations to the finite elements. This example have been analyzed in a number of publications, including Sansour and Bufler [44], Peng and Crisfield [41], Jiang and Chernuka [32], Brank et al [11], Masud et al [37] and Ibrahimbegovic et al [31], to name but a few. The total length of the shell is L ¼ 10:35, with a radius R ¼ 4:953 and thickness t ¼ 0:094.…”
Section: Stretching Of a Cylinder With Free Endsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Formulation of the conventional ten-node C 0 shell element This section describes the geometry and kinematic of the conventional ten-node shell based on the degenerated solid approach (e.g., see Ahmad et al 1970;Zienkiewicz and Taylor 1989;Sze 1994;Brank et al 1995;Basar and Ding 1996;). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%