2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11634-017-0303-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On ill-conceived initialization in archetypal analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that AA++ can also be used as an initialization for archetypoid analysis. Suleman (2017) stresses that an improper initialization of archetypal analysis is problematic and that the FurthestSum method is prone to selecting redundant archetypes, especially when having many archetypes. This is contradicted by our experiments, which show that FurthestSum's problem is rather the poor choice of boundary points.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that AA++ can also be used as an initialization for archetypoid analysis. Suleman (2017) stresses that an improper initialization of archetypal analysis is problematic and that the FurthestSum method is prone to selecting redundant archetypes, especially when having many archetypes. This is contradicted by our experiments, which show that FurthestSum's problem is rather the poor choice of boundary points.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its popularity, FurthestSum has also been criticized. For example, Suleman (2017) states that FurthestSum is prone to selecting redundant archetypes, primarily when many archetypes are used. Redundant archetypes lie in the convex hull of the already selected archetypes and thus do not lower the overall error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore a balance has to be struck between AA cardinality and representation of extremes conditions in the original data set. To avoid the pitfalls of archetype redundancy mentioned by Suleman (2017a) for example, several initialisation procedures, dimension reduction truncation and aggregation levels have to be tested for a number of archetype orders and the results compared (Bauckhage and Thurau 2009;Suleman 2017b).…”
Section: B Archetype Cardinalitymentioning
confidence: 99%