2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10455-011-9295-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On homothetic balanced metrics

Abstract: In this article, we study the set of balanced metrics given in Donaldson's terminology (J. Diff. Geometry 59:479-522, 2001) on a compact complex manifold M which are homothetic to a given balanced one. This question is related to various properties of the Tian-Yau-Zelditch approximation theorem for Kähler metrics. We prove that this set is finite when M admits a non-positive Kähler-Einstein metric, in the case of non-homogenous toric Kähler-Einstein manifolds of dimension ≤ 4 and in the case of the constant sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regular quantizations play a prominent role in the study of Berezin quantization of Kähler manifolds (see [3] , [4], [5] and [19] and references therein). From our point of view we are interested in the following result.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regular quantizations play a prominent role in the study of Berezin quantization of Kähler manifolds (see [3] , [4], [5] and [19] and references therein). From our point of view we are interested in the following result.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in this case d α < ∞ and (6) is a finite sum. The two fundamental results about existence and uniqueness of balanced metrics in the compact case are summarized in the following two theorems (we refer the reader also to the recent article [3] and references therein for a link between balanced metrics and geometric invariant theory).…”
Section: Balanced Metrics: the Compact And The Noncompact Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, by (40) we get, for j, k = 1, 2, ∂ 2 g kk ∂z k ∂z k = kkkk x 2 k + 4 kkk x k + 2 kk , ∂ 2 g kj ∂z k ∂z j = ∂ 2 g kk ∂z j ∂z j = kk j j x k x j + kk j x k + k j j x j + k j , (for k = j) ∂ 2 g jk ∂z k ∂z k = ∂ 2 g kk ∂z k ∂z j = kkk j z 2 kz kz j + 2 kk j z kz j , (for k = j), = 2222 = − 16m 3 e 8m(U −V ) 8 + 43mU + 19mV + 12m 2 4U V + 5U 2 + V 2 (1 + 2m(U + V )) 5 , ∂ 4 ∂ x 3 1 ∂ x 2 = 1112 = 16m 3 e 4m(V −U ) 2 + mU + 13mV + 24m 2 V 2 (1 + 2m(U + V )) 5 ,…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader is also referred to [18] and [19] for a recursive formula for the coefficients a j 's and an alternative computation of a j for j ≤ 3 using Calabi's diastasis function (see also [25] for the case of locally Hermitian symmetric spaces). When M is noncompact, there is not a general theorem which assures the existence of an asymptotic expansion (3). Observe that in this case we say that an asymptotic expansion (3) exists if (4) holds for any compact subset of M .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…if the log-term of the disk bundle D ⊂ L * vanishes then a k = 0 for k > n, where a k are the coefficients appearing in (3). A conjecture still open, due to a private communication with Z. Lu, asks if the vanishing of the a k 's for k > n implies the vanishing of the log-term.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%