1999
DOI: 10.1006/aima.1998.1806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Holomorphic Maps Which Commute with Hyperbolic Automorphisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To generalize the construction of annuli to several complex variables, we will focus our attention to the action of hyperbolic elements on B n . First of all, we recall a result which is due to de Fabritiis and Gentili (see [5]).…”
Section: Preliminaries and Statementsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To generalize the construction of annuli to several complex variables, we will focus our attention to the action of hyperbolic elements on B n . First of all, we recall a result which is due to de Fabritiis and Gentili (see [5]).…”
Section: Preliminaries and Statementsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A word-by-word translation of the previous proof allows the following theorem (first discovered by de Fabritiis and Gentili [11]): Theorem 4.2 Let B n be the unit ball of C n . Let γ be an hyperbolic automorphism of B n and let f be a holomorphic self-map of B n which commutes to γ.…”
Section: Using Property J In Old Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proof of Heins' Theorem is not simpler than the original one (see [14]), but it has the value that it doesn't require any explicit knowledge of the automorphisms group of ∆. For this reason our proof can be translated to prove an analogous result in the unit ball B n (see also [11] and [10]).…”
Section: Using Property J In Old Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uniqueness (up to composition with linear fractional maps) of intertwining mappings in higher dimension-without assign further conditions-does not hold. The main theoretical reason is that in dimension one the centralizer of a given hyperbolic automorphism consists of hyperbolic automorphisms while in higher dimension this is not longer so (see [8]). For example, if H : B N → B N is a hyperbolic automorphism, then any holomorphic self-map…”
Section: Further Remarks and Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%

Valiron's construction in higher dimension

Bracci,
Gentili,
Poggi-Corradini
2007
Preprint
Self Cite