2006
DOI: 10.1090/memo/0855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On higher Frobenius-Schur indicators

Abstract: We study the higher Frobenius-Schur indicators of modules over semisimple Hopf algebras, and relate them to other invariants as the exponent, the order, and the index. We prove various divisibility and integrality results for these invariants. Furthermore, we give some examples that illustrate the general theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
179
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(103 reference statements)
1
179
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. , n} to be congruent to i + k modulo n. (This occurs for similar reasons in [10] as a special case of more general permutation constructions.) Note that s is an n-cycle since n and k are relatively prime.…”
Section: Frobenius-schur Endomorphismsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…. , n} to be congruent to i + k modulo n. (This occurs for similar reasons in [10] as a special case of more general permutation constructions.) Note that s is an n-cycle since n and k are relatively prime.…”
Section: Frobenius-schur Endomorphismsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The higher indicators ν n (V ) of an irreducible group representation V , which have less obvious meaning for the structure of V , were generalized to simple modules of a semisimple Hopf algebra by Kashina, Sommerhäuser, and Zhu [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second holds by (206). The fourth holds by (186), since f ·u and u·f commute in the convolution algebra Hom Sp k (c · c, k · k) by (37). We complete the proof by justifying the last equality.…”
Section: In Additionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Let a i be a monoid and c i a comonoid, for i = 1, 2. If f i , g i : c i → a i are morphisms of species, then (37) (…”
Section: 7mentioning
confidence: 99%