“…Let G 1 be a connected factor of a graph G 0 . As immediately follows from Lemma 4.5 in [2], hc(G 0 ) hc(G 1 ). This result is easy but very useful.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The notions of a hamiltonian coloring and the hamiltonian chromatic number of a connected graph were introduced by Chartrand, Nebeský and Zhang in [2]. The adjective "hamiltonian" in these terms has a transparent motivation: if G is a connected graph, then hc(G) = 1 if and only if G is hamiltonian-connected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connected graph of order n which is, in a very natural sense, the most different from the hamiltonian-connected graphs of order n is the star K 1,n−1 . It was proved in [2] that hc(K 1,n−1 ) = (n − 2) 2 + 1. As was proved in [3], if G is a connected graph of order n 5 which is not a star, then hc(G) hc(K 1,n−1 ) − 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proved in [2] that hc(K 1,n−1 ) = (n − 2) 2 + 1. As was proved in [3], if G is a connected graph of order n 5 which is not a star, then hc(G) hc(K 1,n−1 ) − 2. As follows from another result proved in [2], hc(C n ) = hc(K 1,n−1 ) − 1 = n − 2.…”
“…Let G 1 be a connected factor of a graph G 0 . As immediately follows from Lemma 4.5 in [2], hc(G 0 ) hc(G 1 ). This result is easy but very useful.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The notions of a hamiltonian coloring and the hamiltonian chromatic number of a connected graph were introduced by Chartrand, Nebeský and Zhang in [2]. The adjective "hamiltonian" in these terms has a transparent motivation: if G is a connected graph, then hc(G) = 1 if and only if G is hamiltonian-connected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connected graph of order n which is, in a very natural sense, the most different from the hamiltonian-connected graphs of order n is the star K 1,n−1 . It was proved in [2] that hc(K 1,n−1 ) = (n − 2) 2 + 1. As was proved in [3], if G is a connected graph of order n 5 which is not a star, then hc(G) hc(K 1,n−1 ) − 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proved in [2] that hc(K 1,n−1 ) = (n − 2) 2 + 1. As was proved in [3], if G is a connected graph of order n 5 which is not a star, then hc(G) hc(K 1,n−1 ) − 2. As follows from another result proved in [2], hc(C n ) = hc(K 1,n−1 ) − 1 = n − 2.…”
“…The detour number of a graph was introduced in [3] and further studied in [4,8]. These concepts have interesting applications in Channel Assignment Problem in radio technologies [5,7]. A set S of vertices of G is a detour hull set if [S] D = V (G) and a detour hull set of minimum cardinality is the detour hull number dh(G).…”
A hamiltonian coloring c of a graph G of order n is a mapping c : V (G) → {0, 1, 2, ...} such that D(u, v) + |c(u) − c(v)| ≥ n − 1, for every two distinct vertices u and v of G, where D(u, v) denotes the detour distance between u and v which is the length of a longest u, v-path in G. The value hc(c) of a hamiltonian coloring c is the maximum color assigned to a vertex of G. The hamiltonian chromatic number, denoted by hc(G), is the min{hc(c)} taken over all hamiltonian coloring c of G. In this paper, we present a lower bound for the hamiltonian chromatic number of trees and give a sufficient condition to achieve this lower bound. Using this condition we determine the hamiltonian chromatic number of symmetric trees, firecracker trees and a special class of caterpillars.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.