2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11856-009-0075-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On groups of central type, non-degenerate and bijective cohomology classes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [10] it is also proved that if H = {(a, φ(a) | a ∈ Fa n } is a group of I -type then the IYB group G = φ(Fa n ) naturally acts on the quotient group A = Fa n /K, where K = {a ∈ Fa n | φ(a) = 1} and one obtains a bijective associated 1-cocycle G → A with respect to this action. By a result of Etingof and Gelaki [9], this bijective 1-cocycle yields a non-degenerate 2-cocycle on the semi-direct product A G. This on its turn yields that A G is a group of central type in the sense of Ben David and Ginosar [3], i.e. a finite group H with a 2-cocycle c ∈ Z 2 (H, C * ) such that the twisted group algebra C c H is isomorphic to a full matrix algebra over the complex numbers.…”
Section: Involutive Yang-baxter Groupsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In [10] it is also proved that if H = {(a, φ(a) | a ∈ Fa n } is a group of I -type then the IYB group G = φ(Fa n ) naturally acts on the quotient group A = Fa n /K, where K = {a ∈ Fa n | φ(a) = 1} and one obtains a bijective associated 1-cocycle G → A with respect to this action. By a result of Etingof and Gelaki [9], this bijective 1-cocycle yields a non-degenerate 2-cocycle on the semi-direct product A G. This on its turn yields that A G is a group of central type in the sense of Ben David and Ginosar [3], i.e. a finite group H with a 2-cocycle c ∈ Z 2 (H, C * ) such that the twisted group algebra C c H is isomorphic to a full matrix algebra over the complex numbers.…”
Section: Involutive Yang-baxter Groupsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Hence, α(b 2 , c 2 , i 2 , j 2 ) = α(1, b −1 2 · c 2 , i 2 , j 2 ) (by (9), with a = b 2 ) = α(1, 1, i 2 , j 2 ) (by (7), with a = c −1 2 · b 2 ), and similarly for β(b 2 , c 2 , i 2 , j 2 ) = β(1, 1, i 2 , j 2 ). Note also that…”
Section: Generating All the Non-degenerate Solutions Associated To A mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hence it comes as no surprise that skew left braces, whose initial motivation was also the Yang-Baxter equation, have some connections with Hopf algebras too. Some of them are their relation with triangular semisimple and cosemisimple Hopf algebras explained in [24,9], and the relation with finite dimensional pointed Hopf algebras through rack theory, explained in [1] (we clarify the connection with rack theory in Section 5). These two classes of Hopf algebras have received a lot of attention recently since they are important in the program sketched in [2, pages 376, 377] to try to obtain a classification of finite-dimensional Hopf algebras.…”
Section: An Application To Hopf-galois Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We call the triple (G, Z n , π) an (n-fold) I-datum 1 on the group G. It turns out that a 1-cocycle is bijective if and only if so are all the 1-cocycles in its cohomology class [4,Proposition 4.1]. The fact that bijectivity is a class property is respected by the cohomological structures in §3 and §4.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%