2011
DOI: 10.1134/s2070048211050061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On ground water seepage under hydraulic structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the area of complex velocity is not one sheeted in contrast to the case described in [1], where the area of the complex velocity is one sheeted. The Polubarinova Kochina method [2,3] and also the procedures of conformal mapping [4][5][6] for special areas, which are typical for the problems of under ground hydromechanics [7][8][9] are used to solve the mixed multi parametric boundary problem.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, the area of complex velocity is not one sheeted in contrast to the case described in [1], where the area of the complex velocity is one sheeted. The Polubarinova Kochina method [2,3] and also the procedures of conformal mapping [4][5][6] for special areas, which are typical for the problems of under ground hydromechanics [7][8][9] are used to solve the mixed multi parametric boundary problem.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The moving water flowing around the rabbet rises at a certain height GF and forms a free surface DF, to which the infiltrated water flows with intensity ε. In the examined case, the velocity of the flow at the rabbet's end is infinite, in contrast to [1], where the peak of this velocity is limited by value ε.…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations