2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6585-0_75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Gramian-Based Techniques for Minimal Realization of Large-Scale Mechanical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, since the procedure for cross-Gramian-based Petrov-Galerkin projections suggested in Rahrovani, Vakilzadeh, and Abrahamsson (2014) does generally not yield stable reduced-order models in this setting, an investigation of two-sided and stability-preserving projections for the (non-symmetric) cross Gramian may yield errors comparable to balanced truncation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since the procedure for cross-Gramian-based Petrov-Galerkin projections suggested in Rahrovani, Vakilzadeh, and Abrahamsson (2014) does generally not yield stable reduced-order models in this setting, an investigation of two-sided and stability-preserving projections for the (non-symmetric) cross Gramian may yield errors comparable to balanced truncation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, a singular value decomposition of the cross Gramian, W X SVD = U ΣV, can be utilized. Similarly, S := U and R := V can truncated based on the associated singular values σ i = Σ ii ; yet this projection is only approximately balancing [27,23] and the reduced order model's stability is not guaranteed to be preserved.…”
Section: Cross-gramian-based Model Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches for cross-Gramian-based model reduction have been studied [2,26,27,23,10], of which this work compares a small selection using a procedural benchmark based on a method to generate random systems introduced in [25]. In this setting, a linear time-invariant input-output system is the central object of interest:ẋ (t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t),…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, both subspaces should be incorporated in the reducing and lifting operator. Balanced truncation, for example, determines a suitable Petrov-Galerkin projection 3 , where U 1 = V 1 , by simultaneous diagonalization of the controllability and observability Gramians, while approximate balancing applies the left and right singular vectors of the cross Gramian as oblique projections directly [34]. For the proposed variant of the dominant subspace method (for an algorithmic description see Section 3.3.1), the left and right singular vectors are conjoined as before, but also scaled column-wise by the associated singular values:…”
Section: Cross-gramian-based Dominant Subspacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, both subspaces should be incorporated in the reducing and lifting operator. Balanced truncation, for example, determines a suitable Petrov-Galerkin projection 3 , where U 1 = V 1 , by simultaneous diagonalization of the controllability and observability Gramians, while approximate balancing applies the left and right singular vectors of the cross Gramian as oblique projections directly [34].…”
Section: Cross-gramian-based Dominant Subspacesmentioning
confidence: 99%