2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2022.103653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On geometrically nonlinear mechanics of nanocomposite beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we obtain numerically minimum values of f 0 for locking instability under different values of the system parameters ω and α (see the red "×" in Figure 10). As mentioned in Section 3, locking instability can be depicted by fractal erosion of safe basin of system (2).…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…First, we obtain numerically minimum values of f 0 for locking instability under different values of the system parameters ω and α (see the red "×" in Figure 10). As mentioned in Section 3, locking instability can be depicted by fractal erosion of safe basin of system (2).…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to the theoretical results and numerical ones in Figures 3 and 6, it is clear that when ω � 1, 0.1 ≤ α ≤ 0.28, and 0.24 ≤ f 0 ≤ 0.5, system (2) will undergo a unique periodic motion or locking. It means that the safe basin in Figure 11 is the basin of attraction of the only periodic attractor of system (2). In Figures 11 and 12, as the parameter f 0 increases, the safe basin will become fractal, and its area will be reduced, implying that locking instability becomes more and more obvious.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations