1965
DOI: 10.1007/bf01904851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On generalized graphs

Abstract: A generalizect graph consists of a set of n vertices and a collection of k-tuples. of these vertices (cf. TURAN [1]). In what follows we shall refer to such a configuration as an edge-grapk if k = 2 and, usually, simply as a graph if k > 2. A complete m-graph has mvertices and [k)k-tuples. We say that a graph G is m-saturated if it contains no complete m-graph but loses this property when any new k-tuple is added.Tu~AN [2] proved the following theorem on edge-graphs in 1941: Let n = = g(m-1)+r, where g, m, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
259
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
8
259
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Bollobás [2] completely solved the problem for W k 1,...,1 ∼ = S k 1,...,1 . The saturation function sat(n, W 3 1,1,m ) was asymptotically determined in [22] with the result being exact for infinitely many values of n for every m (when Steiner triple systems with certain parameters exist).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bollobás [2] completely solved the problem for W k 1,...,1 ∼ = S k 1,...,1 . The saturation function sat(n, W 3 1,1,m ) was asymptotically determined in [22] with the result being exact for infinitely many values of n for every m (when Steiner triple systems with certain parameters exist).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construction 2 Let r ≥ 2, 1 ≤ s 1 ≤ · · · ≤ s r−1 = s r , s r ≥ 2, and F = K s 1 ,...,sr . Define p by (2).…”
Section: Further Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will also need the following well-known inequality for cross-intersecting families due to the second author [6]. Finally, we shall require a theorem of Kruskal [21] and Katona [16].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the combinatorial lemma states that t(b, f ) ≤ b+f b (and it is easy to check that this bound is tight). This can be seen as a variation of Bollobáss Theorem [7], which is one of the corner-stones in extremal set theory. (See Section 9.2.2 of [21] for detailed discussions on Bollobáss Theorem and its variants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%