2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On fuzzy multiple objective linear programming problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to eliminate the fuzzy TOPSIS method based on FWA left and right score methods, drawback and achieve the accurate results, we are comparing two GP to verify result of the AGHSEVS LP model. Otherwise, If DMs use the new fuzzy TOPSIS method [37], the conjunction GP approach [38] can be a different result.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to eliminate the fuzzy TOPSIS method based on FWA left and right score methods, drawback and achieve the accurate results, we are comparing two GP to verify result of the AGHSEVS LP model. Otherwise, If DMs use the new fuzzy TOPSIS method [37], the conjunction GP approach [38] can be a different result.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the randomization of relevant parameters in the economic dispatch of a micro-grid, Shuai et al [8] offered a new approximate dynamic programming method to operate the micro-grid under these uncertainties, and showed its good performance in dealing with the historical forecast data to minimize the detrimental impacts of inexact prediction on the operating system with numerical analysis. In order to simplify a model's establishment in an expert system or a knowledge-based system, Chung et al [9] put forward a new fuzzy multiple choice goal programming model to resolve a kind of linear MOP problem, and verified its effectiveness in reducing computational complexity during the solutions and practicability in providing satisfactory solutions. Hamzehee et al [10] introduced a set of MOP problems under the rough environments and further categorized them into five types depending on the location of roughness in the decision set or the objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explicitly, the two most fundamental goals that need to be considered are maximization of finding the targets and minimizing the path length objective that can ensure minimum utilization of resources and implicitly ensure less operational time and energy consumption. It is challenging to find the ideal solution due to the conflicting nature of objective functions; therefore, researchers have proposed different approaches such as weighted sum [51], global criterion [52], goal programming [53], multi-choice goal programming [54], non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II [55], fuzzy-two phase approach [56], etc., and the issue of a specific method largely depends on the decision-makers. Note that UAV path planning is itself an NPhard problem [57]; thus, we use a simple weighted sum approach in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%