2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2013.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On fuzzification of topological categories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In each spatial datasets the weight value was given, to determine the level of importance/influence on the classification produced in each parameter criterion [30,31], This weighting used the fuzzification process, consisting of fuzzy sets indicators in giving a level description in the classification results [32].…”
Section: Spatial Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each spatial datasets the weight value was given, to determine the level of importance/influence on the classification produced in each parameter criterion [30,31], This weighting used the fuzzification process, consisting of fuzzy sets indicators in giving a level description in the classification results [32].…”
Section: Spatial Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This achievement relies on the machinery of topological theories of O. Wyler [18,19], and eventually amounts to the meta-mathematical statement that the whole theory of (fibresmall) topological categories (including, e.g., the categories of poslat topological spaces, shown to be topological over their ground categories in a series of papers of S. E. Rodabaugh) can be done in the framework of catalg topology (a similar but by far more moderate and not that well stated claim was vaguely hinted at in [11] with respect to the poslat topology). The purpose of this talk (which is a shortened version of [14]) is to show a particular development of fuzzy topology in the setting of the catalg one, thereby illustrating the convenient tools of the latter.There currently exist two popular (in the fuzzy community) approaches to lattice-valued topology (which by no means are the only available). The first one, initiated by C. L. Chang [1] and extended later on by J.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%