2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On forecasting wet-snow avalanche activity using simulated snow cover data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wet snow avalanches are a common type of snow avalanche (hereafter also called avalanche) and can release from a point or as a slab, in both cases transporting high-density snow masses downslope at relatively low flow velocities (McClung and Schaerer 2006). Wet snow avalanches are serious natural hazards, due to their mass, their long runout distances and their difficulty to forecast (Bellaire et al 2017). Slushflows are a specific form of wet snow avalanche and are defined as a 'mudflow-like flowage of water-saturated snow' (Washburn and Goldthwait 1958), with a very high liquid water content (Fierz et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wet snow avalanches are a common type of snow avalanche (hereafter also called avalanche) and can release from a point or as a slab, in both cases transporting high-density snow masses downslope at relatively low flow velocities (McClung and Schaerer 2006). Wet snow avalanches are serious natural hazards, due to their mass, their long runout distances and their difficulty to forecast (Bellaire et al 2017). Slushflows are a specific form of wet snow avalanche and are defined as a 'mudflow-like flowage of water-saturated snow' (Washburn and Goldthwait 1958), with a very high liquid water content (Fierz et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the introduced biases can be seen as potential errors due to the interpolation schemes, or biases in the NWP output. For instance, for air temperature, the variation of ± 3 • C (Table 1) corresponds roughly to typical errors between NWP output and TA measurements (Bellaire et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…P had the most significant impact on modeled sensitivity, which may partly be due to the high magnitude of bias (Raleigh et al, 2015). These results have implications for spatial snow cover modeling, which is increasingly applied in avalanche forecasting (Bellaire et al, 2017(Bellaire et al, , 2011Morin et al, 2020;Lafaysse et al, 2017;Vernay et al, 2015). Indeed, our results suggest that if we want to obtain realistic spatial patterns, we need to adequately model snow distribution in mountainous regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Ref. [15] uses this model in conjunction with a snow cover model to forecast avalanche activity; particularly, they concentrate on wet-snow instability. The WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF creates a repository that includes the snow cover model that they used and other similar ones (https://models.slf.ch/).…”
Section: Avalanchesmentioning
confidence: 99%