2018
DOI: 10.1075/aila.00013.per
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On, for, and with practitioners

Abstract: This article explains how research “on” practitioners can be turned into research “for and with” practitioners (Cameron, Frazer, Rampton, & Richardson, 1992, p. 22) by including these practitioners in the research teams. Methodologically, it draws on two decades of multimethod research and knowledge transformation at the interface of applied linguistics and transdisciplinary action research on professional communication (Perrin, 2013). Empirically, it is based on large corpora of data collected in multilin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the Ins are related to practical and ethical obstacles to gain access to authentic data and the Outs relate to what practitioners could gain through collaborations. Recently, the term transdisciplinarity has drawn attention and has advanced the existing concepts of collaboration into the goal of transcending the boundaries within academia and across academia and industries, through cocreating research questions, collecting and interpreting data together, and copublishing outcomes (e.g., Perrin, 2018; Whitehouse, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the Ins are related to practical and ethical obstacles to gain access to authentic data and the Outs relate to what practitioners could gain through collaborations. Recently, the term transdisciplinarity has drawn attention and has advanced the existing concepts of collaboration into the goal of transcending the boundaries within academia and across academia and industries, through cocreating research questions, collecting and interpreting data together, and copublishing outcomes (e.g., Perrin, 2018; Whitehouse, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%