1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3975(99)00070-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On finite automaton public-key cryptosystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the random number generator is independent from the key. Secondly, the weakly reversibility of automata does not affect the cryptosystem, so this system cannot be attacked with methods used for defeating FAPKC cryptosystems [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Thirdly, the key automaton is chosen randomly from a large set of automata with more than 256 states and more that 256 input signals, i.e., more than 256 (256!)…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the random number generator is independent from the key. Secondly, the weakly reversibility of automata does not affect the cryptosystem, so this system cannot be attacked with methods used for defeating FAPKC cryptosystems [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Thirdly, the key automaton is chosen randomly from a large set of automata with more than 256 states and more that 256 input signals, i.e., more than 256 (256!)…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the random number generator is independent from the key. Secondly, this system cannot be attacked with methods used for defeating FAPKC cryptosystems [4][5][6][7][8]. Thirdly, Dӧmӧsi's cryptosystem overcomes some complicated mechanisms in broadcasting/datacasting systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely believed that in practice it is hard to decompose a Turing machine into two parts. For example, a cryptosystem system based on the hardness of decomposition (and inverse) of finite automaton is suggested in Tao and Chen [13]. However, if M is just a simple composition of two TMs M1 and M2, then obviously one can construct M1 (and M2) from M easily.…”
Section: One Way Vcomb-combination Of Turing Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%