2013
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rns292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Fields of Definition of Arithmetic Kleinian Reflection Groups II

Abstract: Following the previous work of Nikulin and Agol, Belolipetsky, Storm, and Whyte it is known that there exist only finitely many (totally real) number fields that can serve as fields of definition of arithmetic hyperbolic reflection groups. We prove a new bound on the degree n k of these fields in dimension 3: n k does not exceed 9. Combined with previous results of Maclachlan and Nikulin, this leads to a new bound n k ≤ 25 which is valid for all dimensions. We also obtain upper bounds for the discriminants of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown there, in particular, that the degree of the field of definition of arithmetic reflection groups in dimension 3 is bounded above by 35. In a joint work with Linowitz [BL14], we improved this bound to 9, which essentially allows to give a list of all possible fields of definition (see [BL14] for the details). The case of n = 2 was considered by Maclachlan in [Mac11].…”
Section: Effective Results Obtained By the Spectral Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown there, in particular, that the degree of the field of definition of arithmetic reflection groups in dimension 3 is bounded above by 35. In a joint work with Linowitz [BL14], we improved this bound to 9, which essentially allows to give a list of all possible fields of definition (see [BL14] for the details). The case of n = 2 was considered by Maclachlan in [Mac11].…”
Section: Effective Results Obtained By the Spectral Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of [Nik11], together with [Mac11] and [BL14] which we shall discuss later on in Section 5, implies:…”
Section: The Work Of Nikulinmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main hurdle is the invariant OEk A W k or rather OEk 0 A W k associated with A, for which we apparently miss good bounds and which we are forced to estimate by the class number. Some observations on this invariant have been also made by Belolipetsky and Linowitz [3] in connection with the enumeration of fields of definition of arithmetic Kleinian reflection groups.…”
Section: Remark 23 (1)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Gabai, Meyerhoff, and Milley identified the Weeks manifold as the lowest volume 3-manifold [41,42], following work of Chinburg, Friedman, Jones, and Reid [21] who showed it was the smallest arithmetic 3-manifold. It arises from a subgroup of index 12 in a maximal group associated to a maximal order in the quaternion algebra over the cubic field of discriminant −23 (generated by a root of x 3 − x + 1) ramified at the real place and the prime of norm 5, or equivalently is obtained by (5, 1), (5,2) surgery on the two components of the Whitehead link. The Weeks manifold has volume 3 · 23 3/2 ζ F (2) 4π 4 = 0.9427 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods allow us to list all arithmetic groups of bounded volume, in particular reproving the results of Chinburg and Friedman and Chinburg, Friedman, Jones, and Reid cited above, replacing technical lemmas with a sequence of algorithmically checkable bounds. We expect that this blend of ideas will be useful in other domains: they have already been adapted to the case of arithmetic reflection groups by Belolipetsky and Linowitz [5]. Finally, we use algorithms for quaternion algebras and arithmetic Fuchsian and Kleinian groups, implemented in MAGMA [8], to carry out the remaining significant enumeration problem: we list the possible pairs and identify the ones of smallest area under congruence hypotheses for both orbifolds and manifolds in dimensions 2 and 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%