2016
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2015.2492502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Feedback Architectures With Zero-Vibration Signal Shapers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be concluded however that the signal shaper being placed in the loop between the controller and the system is rather ineffective in the given objective of suppressing the vibrations caused by disturbance variables. For example, in Huey, et al (2008), it is shown that the architecture is effective in suppressing the sensor disturbances, but completely ineffective in suppressing the oscillations themselves as they are excited by the disturbance, see also Vyhlidal et al (2015b). Let us remark that the ability of this scheme to reject sensor errors effectively has also been experimentally demonstrated in the study by Zuo et al (1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It can be concluded however that the signal shaper being placed in the loop between the controller and the system is rather ineffective in the given objective of suppressing the vibrations caused by disturbance variables. For example, in Huey, et al (2008), it is shown that the architecture is effective in suppressing the sensor disturbances, but completely ineffective in suppressing the oscillations themselves as they are excited by the disturbance, see also Vyhlidal et al (2015b). Let us remark that the ability of this scheme to reject sensor errors effectively has also been experimentally demonstrated in the study by Zuo et al (1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Smith (1958) himself recognized this potential application of his PosiCast shaper and de- veloped a scheme with a compensator and a shaper in the feedback solving the given task. However, as shown by Vyhlidal et al (2015b), the application of the rather complex scheme can be applied if and only if both the controller and the system are biproper. Subsequently, in Hung (2003), a direct augmentation of the standard feedback loop with pre-tuned input command shaper was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These signals result in different responses, the superposition of which could reduce the oscillation amplitude, even to zero. References [17][18][19] proposed concepts of zero-vibration (ZV), zero-vibration-derivative (ZVD), and extra insensitive (EI) shapers. Furthermore, to enhance the robustness against parameter uncertainty, the ZVD k input shaper was proposed, but produced a longer time delay with smaller step size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%