On Failure Propagation in Component-Based Software Systems

Abstract

Ensuring reliability in Component-Based Software Systems (CBSSs) is important for their effective applications in large scale and safety critical systems. However, only few techniques consider failure propagation in system architectures for system reliability assessment. Those techniques focus only on content failure propagation through component interfaces. Therefore, the evaluation of CBSS architectures based on the current techniques fails to consider the impacts of all failure types on system reliability. In this paper, we present a failure propagation analysis technique for CBSSs. We analyze failure propagation based on architectural service routes (ASRs). An ASR is a sequence of components that are connected through interfaces. We discuss the attributes of ASRs with respect to system components and present their impacts on failure propagation and consequently on the reliability of CBSSs. Further analysis determines upper and lower bounds of failure propagation among components and shows some relationships between system reliability and architectural attributes. Our technique is not limited to any failure type, and it considers failure scattering and masking. Therefore, unlike other works, the proposed technique demonstrates more accurate representation of the practical aspect of failure propagation in CBSSs. The technique can also be used to achieve reliable designs in the early design stages of CBSSs and to localize component faults in the operational stage. We compare different example architectures based on their impacts on system reliability.

A service based approach to decentralized diagnosis and fault tolerant control

“…The approach here stands in contrast to earlier literature, e.g. see [9], [6], in which fault propagation is constrained to signal flow directions.…”

Probabilistic error propagation model for mechatronic systems

“…Mohamed and Zulkernine [27] present another approach to error propagation analysis and its application for system reliability assessment, based on the definition of the architecture service routes. In spite of several deviations, Mohammed's model can be considered an offshoot of Cortellessa's model [28,29].…”

Deriving fault-detection mechanisms from safety requirements

“…The main difference between the FTA/FMEA and safety requirement propagation/failure propagation is the "dimension" in which they operate: the first ones operate along a chain of (hazard-) refinements and the later ones operate along the data flow in a system. Various research groups work on different aspects of failure propagation, like [12] and [28]. The general goal is to analyze the propagation paths of failures in systems to get an understanding of the overall emergent failure behavior.…”