1990
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1990-0984802-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On extensions of models of strong fragments of arithmetic

Abstract: Abstract.Using a weak notion of recursive saturation (not always semiregularity) we prove that there are no finitely generated countable models of B~Ln + ->/!"(« > 0). We consider the problem of not almost semiregularity of models of /X" + -"5S"+i . From a partial solution to this problem we deduce a generalization of the theorem of Smorynski and Stavi on cofinal extensions of recursively saturated models of arithmetic.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we state and prove our main theorem on isomorphisms between models of WKL * 0 + ¬IΣ 0 1 . One can view the theorem as a generalization to second-order arithmetic of a result of Kossak's [28, Theorem 3.1] (see [29] or [20] for a correction to the proof) saying that every countable model of BΣ 1 (A) + exp + ¬IΣ 1 (A) has continuum many automorphisms. In fact, our proof is somewhat reminiscent of Kossak's argument, in which one also finds a truth-coding trick that goes back to Smoryński [34, Proof.…”
Section: The Isomorphism Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we state and prove our main theorem on isomorphisms between models of WKL * 0 + ¬IΣ 0 1 . One can view the theorem as a generalization to second-order arithmetic of a result of Kossak's [28, Theorem 3.1] (see [29] or [20] for a correction to the proof) saying that every countable model of BΣ 1 (A) + exp + ¬IΣ 1 (A) has continuum many automorphisms. In fact, our proof is somewhat reminiscent of Kossak's argument, in which one also finds a truth-coding trick that goes back to Smoryński [34, Proof.…”
Section: The Isomorphism Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loftiness and the -property. This section is concerned with some properties of models that were introduced in [4], [5], and [11]. Results of this section will be used in the proofs of the main results although automorphism groups do not appear here.…”
Section: To What Extent Does Aut(m) Determine Ssy(m)? Th(m)?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [11], the following lemma is implicit in [5]; it is explicitly proved in [ Proof. We sketch the proof as it will be needed later on.…”
Section: To What Extent Does Aut(m) Determine Ssy(m)? Th(m)?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result that any countable K \= BZ" + exp + ~iIS" has 2 No automorphisms is due to Roman Kossak [1990], and many of his ideas are used in the proof of Theorem 3.3 below. Notice that 3.1 follows from 3.2 and 3.3 since, as in the proof of 1.4, by compactness we may take any L >-K with K not cofinal in L and take N = K as given in (ii) of the statement of 3.1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So suppose we are given a countable K \= BZ" + exp + ~i LE", where n > 1. Initially, we follow a modification of the proof in Kossak [1990] that K has continuum-many automorphisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%