2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2011
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2011.5935003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On expressing networks with flow transformations in convolution-form

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Denoting this indicator function for bit i as Xi, we define the scaling element as a random process X = (Xi) i≥1 (a more general definition can be found in [4]). We denote the scaled arrivals as A X (t) and…”
Section: Modelling the Demultiplexing Of Variable Length Packet Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Denoting this indicator function for bit i as Xi, we define the scaling element as a random process X = (Xi) i≥1 (a more general definition can be found in [4]). We denote the scaled arrivals as A X (t) and…”
Section: Modelling the Demultiplexing Of Variable Length Packet Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is, after being served by each node the output is always packets, i.e., the bits are packetized by a packetizer P L . The other is, there is no packetizer after service, yet we observe from the bit flow the last bit of each packet according to a packet process L. In previous work [4] we derive the end-to-end delay bound for the bit flow under flow transformation. The second case can be a critical challenge for that approach (L-modulated scaling process and sampling due to L).…”
Section: Definition 2 (Packet Scaling Element)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations