2002
DOI: 10.12921/cmst.2002.08.02.46-57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Explicit Interval Methods of Adams-Bashforth Type

Abstract: Abstract. In our previous paper [1] we have considered implicit interval multistep methods of AdamsMoulton type for solving the initial value problem. On the basis of these methods and the explicit ones introduced by Sokin [2] we wanted to construct predictor-corrector (explicit-implicit) interval methods. However, it turned out that the formulas given by Šokin are incorrect even in the simplest case. Therefore, in this paper we direct our attention to the explicit interval methods of Adams-Bashforth type and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [19,26,28], we have proved that for the methods (30) and (37) (or (32) and (38), respectively) we have y (t k ) ∈ Y k , where y (t) is the exact solution of the initial value problem (1), and we have also estimated the widths w (Y k ) of the intervals Y k obtained by these methods.…”
Section: And (T Y ) Is An Interval Extension Of ψ (T Y (T)) ≡ F (Nmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In [19,26,28], we have proved that for the methods (30) and (37) (or (32) and (38), respectively) we have y (t k ) ∈ Y k , where y (t) is the exact solution of the initial value problem (1), and we have also estimated the widths w (Y k ) of the intervals Y k obtained by these methods.…”
Section: And (T Y ) Is An Interval Extension Of ψ (T Y (T)) ≡ F (Nmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As for the method (19), for interval equivalents of (25), it is important to write two coefficients ν * n+1 and ν * * n instead of one ν n+1 = ν * n+1 + ν * * n+1 (see Section 4 for details).…”
Section: Conventional Predictor-corrector Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CPU times have been equal to 36.019 s for the method (16), 1.152 s for (17), 0.344 s Fig. 1 Step size changes in problem (45) for the methods (16)- (19) for (18), and 0.415 s for the method (19). The changes of step sizes are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%