1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02107327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On existence of a best uniform approximation of a function in two variables by the sums ϕ(x) + Ψ(y)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diliberto-Straus [6], Flatto [8], Garkavi-Medvedev-Khavinson [10], von Golitschek [11,12], von Golitschek-Light [13], Light-Cheney [16,17] and Rivlin-Sibner [19]. They mainly deal with the question of proximinality, non-uniqueness as well as with an algorithmic approach to best uniform approximants.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diliberto-Straus [6], Flatto [8], Garkavi-Medvedev-Khavinson [10], von Golitschek [11,12], von Golitschek-Light [13], Light-Cheney [16,17] and Rivlin-Sibner [19]. They mainly deal with the question of proximinality, non-uniqueness as well as with an algorithmic approach to best uniform approximants.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set S satisfies all conditions of Theorem 3 of [15] on existence of the best approximation ϕ 0 (x)+ψ 0 (y). By Havinson's result [5], E(f, S) = sup l⊂S {|r(f, l)|}.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Diliberto and Straus [6] were the first to establish a formula for E( f ,R), where R is a rectangle with sides parallel to coordinate axes. Their formula contains the supremum over all closed lightning bolts (for this terminology, see [1,8,9,11,13]). Later the same formula was established by other authors differently in rectangular case (see [13]) and for more general sets (see [9,11]).…”
Section: Approximation By Sums Of Univariate Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has several reasons, which get clear through the proof of Theorem 2.1. Here we are able to explain one of these reasons: by [8,Theorem 3], a continuous function f (x, y) defined on a polygon with sides parallel to coordinate axes has an extremal element, the existence of which is required by our method. Now, let K be a rectangle (not speaking about polygons) with sides not parallel to coordinate axes.…”
Section: Approximation By Sums Of Univariate Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%