On evidence and evidence-based medicine: Lessons from the philosophy of science

Abstract

The evidence-based medicine (EBM) movement is touted as a new paradigm in medical education and practice, a description that carries with it an enthusiasm for science that has not been seen since logical positivism flourished (circa 1920-1950). At the same time, the term ''evidence-based medicine'' has a ring of obviousness to it, as few physicians, one suspects, would claim that they do not attempt to base their clinical decision-making on available evidence. However, the apparent obviousness of EBM can and should be challenged on the grounds of how 'evidence' has been problematised in the philosophy of science. EBM enthusiasm, it follows, ought to be tempered.The post-positivist, feminist, and phenomenological philosophies of science that are examined in this paper contest the seemingly unproblematic nature of evidence that underlies EBM by emphasizing different features of the social nature of science. The appeal to the authority of evidence that characterizes evidence-based practices does not increase objectivity but rather obscures the subjective elements that inescapably enter all forms of human inquiry. The seeming common sense of EBM only occurs because of its assumed removal from the social context of medical practice. In the current age where the institutional power of medicine is suspect, a model that represents biomedicine as politically disinterested or merely scientific should give pause. r

‘As a clinician, you are not managing lab results, you are managing the patient’: How the enactment of malaria at health facilities in Cameroon compares with new WHO guidelines for the use of malaria tests

“…Lessons from the adoption of evidence-based approaches elsewhere suggests expectations for rapid scale-up of RDTs may need to be reined-in. In addition, those aiming for targets for all patients to be tested for malaria and treated in line with results may need to accept that while the strategy of appealing to 'the evidence' as the bottom line is attractive as a rationalisation project, this may be fought for at the expense of other aspects of the complex social process of health care (Goldenberg, 2006).…”

Benefit or burden? A sociotechnical analysis of diagnostic computer kiosks in four California hospital emergency departments

“…Unfortunately, many health IT projects are planned as if "implementation" were merely a matter of integrating technology into existing practices, and as if technological devices and systems operated as rational tools or "evidence" machines e containing and reproducing stable "facts" about the world (Goldenberg, 2006). This approach imagines technologies, hospitals, medical workers, and patients to be "pre-givens, thus making the critical task the creation of a 'fit' between technology and organization" (Langstrup, 2008).…”

If Intervention Is Method, What Are We Learning?

“…In the case of my own work on EBM, I found during fieldwork and interviews that the concept of a "hierarchy of evidence" with (meta-reviews of) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) at the top, was not merely challenged by sociologists who criticize the naïve epistemological politics of the EBM movement (Goldenberg 2006). It was also heavily contested within this "movement," or rather, this internally diverse field of practice.…”