2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49409-8_52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Evaluation of 6D Object Pose Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to these works, our focus is not the localization of an object of interest in an image or with respect to the camera, but the relative positioning of one object with respect to another, the robot and the block. Rather than targeting full 6DOF pose (Hodaň et al, 2016), we restrict ourselves to two position and one angle parameters, since one can reasonably assume that both the robot and the block are standing on a more or less flat surface. We developed a direct prediction approach, building on the success of the CNN based-approaches and following the logic of end-to-end learning, to learn to directly predict the relative pose.…”
Section: Object Localization and Pose Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to these works, our focus is not the localization of an object of interest in an image or with respect to the camera, but the relative positioning of one object with respect to another, the robot and the block. Rather than targeting full 6DOF pose (Hodaň et al, 2016), we restrict ourselves to two position and one angle parameters, since one can reasonably assume that both the robot and the block are standing on a more or less flat surface. We developed a direct prediction approach, building on the success of the CNN based-approaches and following the logic of end-to-end learning, to learn to directly predict the relative pose.…”
Section: Object Localization and Pose Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 11 (b) shows the recall values when δ = 15, τ = 100, and t = 0.5. Note that these are also the parameters used in the experiments of the original publication of VSD [3]. Slightly decreasing the parameter δ gives rise lower recall values, however, we cannot see any significant difference from the point of characteristics of the bar charts.…”
Section: B Analyses Based On Visible Surface Discrepancymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Sym Pose Distance. VSD [3] is presented as an ambiguityinvariant pose error function. The acceptance of a pose hypothesis as correct depends on the plausibility of the estimated pose given the available data.…”
Section: B Metrics: Correctness Of An Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In robotics, fiducial markers are commonly used for detecting the objects and predicting their pose relative to the camera [17] but their use limits the type of environments the robot can operate in. This constraint can be removed by using a trainable object detector architecture [18]- [20,27]- [29]. However, these methods often require gathering training data for the target objects at hand, which is often time consuming and requires the knowledge of the object (e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%