2014
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On estimation and identifiability issues of sex‐linked inheritance with a case study of pigmentation in Swiss barn owl (Tyto alba)

Abstract: Genetic evaluation using animal models or pedigree-based models generally assume only autosomal inheritance. Bayesian animal models provide a flexible framework for genetic evaluation, and we show how the model readily can accommodate situations where the trait of interest is influenced by both autosomal and sex-linked inheritance. This allows for simultaneous calculation of autosomal and sex-chromosomal additive genetic effects. Inferences were performed using integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the barn owl, we found evidence for the hypothesis that spot size is sexually antagonistically selected (positive selection in females and negative selection in males; Roulin et al ., , ). Although some of the underlying genes are located on sex chromosomes (Roulin et al ., ; Larsen et al ., ; Table ), the genetic correlation between males and females for spot size is very strong (0.963; Table b), implying that small‐spotted fathers will produce counter‐selected daughters. Furthermore, if the absolute strength of negative selection exerted in males is weaker than positive selection in females, males will evolve away from their phenotypic optimum, as we could demonstrate in Switzerland (Roulin et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the barn owl, we found evidence for the hypothesis that spot size is sexually antagonistically selected (positive selection in females and negative selection in males; Roulin et al ., , ). Although some of the underlying genes are located on sex chromosomes (Roulin et al ., ; Larsen et al ., ; Table ), the genetic correlation between males and females for spot size is very strong (0.963; Table b), implying that small‐spotted fathers will produce counter‐selected daughters. Furthermore, if the absolute strength of negative selection exerted in males is weaker than positive selection in females, males will evolve away from their phenotypic optimum, as we could demonstrate in Switzerland (Roulin et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To examine whether any of the phenotypic variance observed in the reddish pheomelanin‐based coloration, number and diameter of black spots was due to genes located on the Z‐chromosomes (see Roulin et al ., ; Larsen et al ., ), we estimated autosomal and Z‐chromosomal additive genetic variances using Bayesian animal models and the INLA framework (Steinsland & Jensen, ; Holand et al ., ; Larsen et al ., ). These Bayesian animal models can currently only be used for single‐trait models and could hence not be used to estimate additive genetic covariances within and across sexes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we considered only the size of eumelanic spots, since the hypothesis about a link between daily variation in body mass and the size of spots measured in the two parents holds for this trait only. Spot size is strongly heritable (h 2 = 0.82, Roulin et al ., ) and about 27% of the between‐individual variation is explained by genes located on the Z sex chromosome and 44% by genes located on the autosomes (Larsen et al ., ). The between nest variance in spot size is 0.72 and the within nest variances 1.04 indicating that the variance between the individuals within the same nest may be even bigger than the variance of the mean of the nests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the large majority of studies in wild populations estimate additive genetic (co)variances while assuming only autosomal inheritance (Charmantier et al , 2014). Recent investigations on colour variation have revealed Z-linked genetic variance in the collared flycatcher Ficedulla albicollis (explaining 40% of total phenotypic variance in wing patch size; Husby et al , 2013), the barn owl Tyto alba (30% of variance in eumelanic spot diameter; Larsen et al , 2014) and W-linked genetic variance in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata (2.6% of variance in beak colouration; Evans et al , 2014). In many other cases however, investigations show no evidence for sex-linked genetic variance in colour ornamentation (for example, the Florida scrub-jay Aphelocoma coerulescens ; Tringali et al , 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%